santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, You can always see your envelopes Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. 11 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. The motion was timely filed and served. try clicking the minimize button instead. 2 V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. dedicated phone number for the department as referenced in the local telephone Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Last. 7 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 13 v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO DESIGNATE CASE AS COMPLEX ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. SAETERN, ET AL. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 CASE NO. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . Pay Traffic Tickets. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. ELAINE PICO, M.D. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. ONLINE SERVICES. This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 24 She asserts a cause of action against Safeway for premises liability (negligence). Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Notice of non-opposition filed. RESPONSES The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: IN RE QUANTUM CORP. Where appearance has been requested or invited by SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). Background This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. before the hearing. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. 12 WALTER MANAY, an individual, JOSE UMANZOR, an individual, individually, and on 13 behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Private Attorneys General Act, FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT try clicking the minimize button instead. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. Line 4 10 A. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. DIANE CARLSON, ET AL. Search public court records from the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, filing date, courthouse, case type, party type, party representation, and more. to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Skip to main content. According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Plaintiff Institute for Business & Technology, Inc. (Plaintiff) alleges that it has been a tenant at a commercial property located at 2400 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara, California since 2003. ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 14 INTRODUCTION Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 23 This is a putative class action. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. I. Defendant Foster Poultry Farms Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). 2 The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. (Complaint, BC-1 and Exh. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . This is an action involving an automobile accident. 21 I. Please wait a moment while we load this page. . 22 I. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. INTRODUCTION Factual and Procedural Background Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 8 EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. I. will be able to access it on trellis. individually and in his official capacity; CHARMIE RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. 6 If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, And Password 611386. AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). 18 Defendant. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. Footnote 15: (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Local Rule 1.06 (B). JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. A.) Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. 38). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 2. Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: In December 2016, Nguye and 6 To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. We're sorry your court map could not be found. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 13 CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. This is a lemon law case. BACKGROUND According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. ET AL. Footnote 18: 19 First 12 On March 16, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy Slater (plaintiff) filed the instant motion for attorney fees and request for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Pay Criminal Fines. Footnote 17: Defendants. CourtCall is . SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. 11 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, JOSEPH BASS, 12 DAVID BOGGINI, LAWRENCE JAY TENTATIVE RULING RE: CASTELLANO, RICHARD COCO, LESLYE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 13 CORSIGLIA, HARRY FREITAS, MICHAEL THE PLEADINGS GIUSTI, LINDA HORWEDEL (THE 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. 6. Filter by a specific county without spaces. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 10 V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. Plaintiffs, RETAIL, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. Proc. 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. A: click . If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Factual and Procedural Background -2 Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. 23 I. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. system. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), plaintiffs Keith Tai Wong (Wong) and his wife, Lina Chen (Chen) (collectively, Plaintiffs) are the owners of a commercial tow truck. I. 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Factual and Procedural Background V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 20PR188357. Case no. will be able to access it on trellis. For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. Background To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. Background FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California 1 through 10, inclusive, Probate Tentative Rulings. These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's

Life Expectancy After Heart Attack By Age, Deaths In Sandpoint, Idaho, Articles S